Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2's 75.3 score. The Google Pixel 5 body has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, but it is somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a bit greater pixel number per display inch and a little bit larger screen. Google Pixel 5 features more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 5 features superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.