Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a 77.7 score against 75.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. The HTC One M9 design is somewhat thicker but a bit lighter than Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
The HTC One M9 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a quite higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
HTC One M9 features a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a much better video resolution and a way more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.