Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a overall score of 85.4 against 75.3. The LG K92 construction is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but LG K92 has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG K92 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. LG K92 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory.
The LG K92 features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way better video resolution, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a much more mega-pixels camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality. LG K92 features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG K92 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.