Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 75.3. The LG V35 ThinQ design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. LG V35 ThinQ features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a greater display pixels density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger aperture and a back camera with a higher resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.