Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a score of 87.1 against 75.3. LG Velvet is a just a little heavier phone than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, but both are equally thin. The LG Velvet has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity. The LG Velvet takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a back camera with lot more MP and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.