Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having an 81.9 score against 75.3. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo body is just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a bigger screen, a better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.