Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a 76.1 score against 75.3. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this review, the Moto G Power is a somewhat thicker and heavier phone than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G Power has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2300px resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a more MP camera, a larger aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor. The Moto G Power counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.