Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a 76.3 score against 75.3. The Moto Z3 Play body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. The Moto Z3 Play features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a little better pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Moto Z3 Play features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z3 Play counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z3 Play also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z3 Play shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a lesser mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.