Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a general score of 87 against 75.3. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, but it's somewhat heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a display that's just as good as the display in Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display and a bit worse 876 x 2142px resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality photos.
Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 18% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.