Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 401 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a global score of 79.2 against 75.3. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is a lot thinner but somewhat heavier than Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the older 15 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy J7 Prime 2 features a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher 50 MP resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.