Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2's 75.3 general score. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, the nubia Red Magic 3S construction is thicker and incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. These phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.