Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a score of 91.3 against 75.3. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52 5G counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.