Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a 77.7 score against 75.3. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 body is a little lighter but a little thicker than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM amount. Galaxy J7 Prime 2 and Samsung Galaxy Note3 have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a little lower display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy Note3 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 192 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.