Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, getting a score of 98 against 75.3. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a lot better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.