Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.00 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2's global score of 75.3. The Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and much thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S25 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S25 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better video resolution.
Galaxy S25 has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.