Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.00 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, having a 90.7 score against 75.3. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a just a little better screen density, a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot higher video definition, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better battery life than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.