Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a score of 86.6, which is better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2's overall score of 75.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Black Shark 3's body is way heavier and thicker than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.