Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a score of 90.1 against 75.3. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is thicker and a lot heavier than Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a little bit higher pixels count per screen inch, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot higher video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.