Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a little bit better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a global score of 78.2 against 75.3. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3's design is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has older 10 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a better camera than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.