Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2, with a general score of 79 against 75.3. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.