Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 is way better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with a score of 88.7 against 72.7. Apple iPhone 12's construction is noticeably newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy J7 Refine. The Apple iPhone 12 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 Refine works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 12 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 12 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a bit larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a much better number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 12, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 400 GB. IPhone 12 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine counts with improved battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.