Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's general score of 72.7. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro design is a lot newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 12 Pro has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory. Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, a bit larger display and a lot higher screen density.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher (4K) video quality. Apple iPhone 12 Pro features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy J7 Refine features better battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.