Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s has a score of 83, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's overall score of 72.7. IPhone 6s's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, even though it was released 3 years before. The iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 6s counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has 6 less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 6s also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 6s has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density and a slightly better 1334 x 750 pixels resolution.
The iPhone 6s shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture and a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
IPhone 6s counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has a 92 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.