Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 overall score. Although the iPhone 8 Plus is older and somewhat heavier than Galaxy J7 Refine, it's body is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone 8 Plus has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Apple iPhone 8 Plus also has a much better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy J7 Refine features superior battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.