Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is way better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 general score. The iPhone X design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine, even though both of them were only released 8 months apart. Apple iPhone X features a superior CPU than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X has a lot better looking display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a bit larger screen, a much better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The Apple iPhone X captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels resolution and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a larger sensor.
IPhone X counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy J7 Refine has better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.