Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. The iPhone XR body is just a little heavier but a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and both were only released with a couple months difference. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 828 x 1792.
Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Apple iPhone XR features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone XR shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy J7 Refine has a bit better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.