Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than Galaxy J7 Refine, getting an 84.2 score against 72.7. The iPhone XS is a just a bit lighter and thinner device than the Galaxy J7 Refine, although they were released only 3 months apart. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a way better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much greater pixels density, a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a bit bigger screen.
IPhone XS features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy J7 Refine features longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture and a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.