Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than Galaxy J7 Refine, getting an 81.9 score against 72.7. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy J7 Refine. Google Pixel 4 counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a less MP camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.