Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's global score of 72.7. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is way newer, a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way higher pixels amount per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.