Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 score. The Google Pixel 5 body is a lot newer, just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit bigger display and a lot higher screen density. The Google Pixel 5 has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 5 counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.