Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, with a 77 score against 72.7. The Honor 50 Pro construction is way newer and just a little thinner, but a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Honor 50 Pro has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. Honor 50 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a much higher pixels density and a larger display.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Honor 50 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.