Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Refine's general score of 72.7. Even though the LG G7 Fit and the Galaxy J7 Refine were only released with a few months difference, the LG G7 Fit is lighter and just a little thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo, giving you a couple additional features.
LG G7 Fit counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way greater screen density, a little bit bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has a bit better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG G7 Fit counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier sensor and a way tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.