Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. Although LG K92 is heavier than the Galaxy J7 Refine, it's just a little thinner and a lot newer. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG K92 counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher pixels amount per display inch, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The LG K92 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory.
The LG K92 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG K92 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG K92 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.