Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, with a overall score of 78.6 against 72.7. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has the older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG V10's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, but it is a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has a little faster CPU than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The LG V10 counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a little larger display and a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG V10 features a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution, a larger sensor and a camera in the back with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V10 has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy J7 Refine counts with just a little better battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.