Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy J7 Refine, having an 81.3 score against 72.7. The LG V35 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy J7 Refine, although both were released only a couple of months apart. LG V35 ThinQ has a quite better processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher screen density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a quite bigger display. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality pictures, it also counts with a larger aperture, a much higher video definition and a better resolution back camera.
LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.