Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 score. The LG V40 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, even though they were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a lot higher display pixels density and a bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The LG V40 ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger back camera sensor.
The LG V40 ThinQ's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.