Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is way better than Galaxy J7 Refine's overall score of 72.7. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is newer than the Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V60 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a larger display. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a way better resolution camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.