Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is way better than Galaxy J7 Refine, having a 91.2 score against 72.7. These devices include Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG Wing is a a lot newer cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Refine, but it is a lot heavier and incredibly thicker.
The LG Wing has a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM. LG Wing counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a way better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bigger screen.
LG Wing has a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
The LG Wing has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 224 GB more internal storage. The LG Wing counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.