Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with a overall score of 89.6 against 72.7. Motorola edge's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy J7 Refine. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola edge features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola edge counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola edge captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola edge features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola edge counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.