Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a score of 78.5 against 72.7. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's construction is way newer, somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy J7 Refine. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the older 12 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy J7 Refine has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4400mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better resolution back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.