Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a just a bit heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, but both of them have the same thickness. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch of display, a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.