Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a global score of 87.1 against 72.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy J7 Refine, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.