Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Refine's general score of 72.7. Moto G 5G Plus's body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy J7 Refine. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a larger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a way better number of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G 5G Plus features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.