Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Power has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Moto G Power is newer than the Galaxy J7 Refine, it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Moto G Power counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G Power also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G Power has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2300px resolution, a bigger screen and a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Power has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Power captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a higher 16 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G Power features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.