Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G6 Plus is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a score of 77.5 against 72.7. The Moto G6 Plus design is just a little lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine, even when both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Moto G6 Plus has a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a little bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Moto G6 Plus counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Moto G6 Plus has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G6 Plus also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy J7 Refine features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. Motorola Moto G6 Plus takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G6 Plus also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.