Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has the older 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Despite of the fact that Moto Z Force is older than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, it's construction is thinner and just a little lighter.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way better screen pixel density. The Moto Z Force features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way better 3840x2160 video definition. Moto Z Force features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
Moto Z Force features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.