Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. The Moto Z2 Play is an older phone than the Galaxy J7 Refine, but Motorola was able to make it noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a way greater screen density and a way better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play has just a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto Z2 Play also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a little bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. Galaxy J7 Refine features a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.