Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 score. The Motorola One 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy J7 Refine, although it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola One 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One 5G also has more RAM.
Motorola One 5G has a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution, way more pixels per inch in the display and a bigger display. Motorola One 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola One 5G features a way better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.