Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 global score. The Motorola One Action is a newer and a little lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, but it is also just a little bit thicker. Motorola One Action features a better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2520 resolution, a way better screen pixel density and a quite larger display.
The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One Action also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Action features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Action takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. Motorola One Action features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.