Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 score. Even though Motorola One Zoom is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Motorola One Zoom features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better screen density. Motorola One Zoom has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Zoom features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Zoom features better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.